This week I am starting a new class
called Communication Theory and
Practice. (It's all theory, as far as I can tell.) I have been
dreading the class that sounds so dull and dry. I finally started my
reading the other day and found it kind of interesting. I think the
author of the textbook is a very personable writer – I'm sure that
helps. I had forgotten that I do enjoy analyzing things sometimes.
Above all, it had slipped my mind that I am studying what has proved
to be a very palatable area for me. I like communication studies!
The introductory chapters have proven
to be a little disconcerting, though. There are two main schools of
thought in the area of communication theory: a scientific one, and an
interpretive theory. Fine. As I read through a brief description of
each I found that both appealed to me. But the text was clear that
you probably fall into one camp or the other. In fact, scholars from
the two areas are so at odds with one another they often argue and
disagree. So why are both equally appealing to me?
Eventually it came out that these two
can areas compliment each other and also could be seen as a
continuum. That helps – a little. The problem now is that I really
don't feel I'm in the middle. I truly like both sides. I want both to
be the proper way to view communication theory. This remains an
unsolved dilemma. I may or may not come to some conclusion. But this
is for sure, it's going to be a very intense 6 weeks of communication
theory. This may be the class that helps me decide how far I'm going
to take this whole going back to school thing.
No comments:
Post a Comment